<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live Blogging: Notes on the Climate Security Act (Lieberman-Warner), Day 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.climateandenergy.org/2008/06/05/live-blogging-notes-on-the-climate-security-act-lieberman-warner-day-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.climateandenergy.org/2008/06/05/live-blogging-notes-on-the-climate-security-act-lieberman-warner-day-4/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: News Update: Follow up on Warner-Lieberman, Climate Security Act &#171; Climate and energy</title>
		<link>http://blog.climateandenergy.org/2008/06/05/live-blogging-notes-on-the-climate-security-act-lieberman-warner-day-4/#comment-1077</link>
		<dc:creator>News Update: Follow up on Warner-Lieberman, Climate Security Act &#171; Climate and energy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateandenergy.wordpress.com/?p=420#comment-1077</guid>
		<description>[...] June 11, 2008   Now that wasn&#8217;t so bad, now, was it&#8230; On one hand, the Warner-Lieberman Climate Security Act didn&#8217;t get enough votes in the Senate to make it past a procedural vote to continue debate on the bill. (For CEP coverage of the W-L debate, check here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] June 11, 2008   Now that wasn&#8217;t so bad, now, was it&#8230; On one hand, the Warner-Lieberman Climate Security Act didn&#8217;t get enough votes in the Senate to make it past a procedural vote to continue debate on the bill. (For CEP coverage of the W-L debate, check here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
